Orange County Consumer Fraud Logic

We find two premises (numbers 1 and 2) and one conclusion (number 3) here. So where's the proposition? My propositions exist within premises 1 and 2. It pops out on its own. Other propositions may also pop out, but what Eddie Evans looks for is a proposition for helping grieving families learn about Orange County Government Corruption.

His proposition is inferred, assumed. Now assumed is a dirty word, but we clean it up with statistical probability. If we assume all chicken lay eggs, we assume too much. If we assume some chickens lay eggs, we assume a statistically measurable assumption. Orange County Courts like to argue that assuming facts does not cut it. "Assuming facts not in evidence" is not within many court calendars, to put it another way.

However, we do have facts. Numerous high ranking web pages on Orange County's Internet. A telephone roped around Eddie Evans' neck 24/7/365, except during showers. Consequently, if someone needs to call a crime scene cleanup company, then the odds are, in probability, callers for crime scene cleanup help will invariably reach Eddie Evans sooner or later. At the moment these telephone calls occur at the rate of less than 1 per year.

Top

Conclusion - These are propositions supported by premises and other propositions. A conclusion arises from a structure, a house-like structure with furniture -- observations, inferences, and facts.

A conclusion may come before its premise. Here's an example: Orange County coroner fraud occurs routinely. After all, homicides, suicides, and unattended deaths needing a biohazard company occur daily.

There's a proposition within these two sentences, which means Orange County's employees take part in fraud. We need to spend some more time on this one proposition, county employee's commit fraud.

Every law is an evil; for every law is an infraction of liberty.

A simple argument like this one should not confuse even the dullest Orange County administrator. But . . . .

Here's something on a hypothetical way of thinking, which some will easily confuse with logical arguments.

If county coroner employees started swindling Orange County's families from the county's beginning, then we should expect this swindling to continue until far into our future.

It seems logical enough to come to this future as a conclusion, but it is more of a hypothetical statement in need of proof. How might we test it? We probably cannot test it because we do not have evidence for the existence of coroner swindling early in Orange County's history.

Top

Premise - Premises come to rest on one another's shoulders. Somewhere exists a premise on which all logical premises exist, but it is beyond our task to go that direction.

A proposition used in an argument to support another proposition in an argument. Some of our simplest arguments have only one preposition. Here's an example from an Alabama textbook. No one was present when life first appeared on earth. Therefore any statement about life's origins should be considered as theory, not fact.

Top

We can neither prove nor disprove this premise because no one has any evidence one way or the other. I would say, "The probability of someone being around at the time of earth's creation is not great." Most important about this argument for a zero human population at earth's creation, we're not sure what actually constituted earth by this argument because earth had many moments becoming "earth." But this is an entirerly different argument for another time and place. We will stay on task and continue with our premises.

Some premises are stated with the same sentence as its conclusion.

Since it turns out that all humans are descended from a small number of African ancestors in our recent evolutionary past, believing in profound differences between the races is as ridiculous as believing in a flat earth.

Propositions - A structured pattern of propositions gives readers and listeners the idea that they read and hear an argument. Sometimes what appears to be the case is not so.

Eddie Evans understands, describes, and illustrates principles of honest biohazard cleanup, exposing county government fraud, and solution to coroner and administrator fraud. He uncovered Orange County Government consumer fraud, how it works, whose involved, and why they cheat our Orange County tax payers. He created hundreds of web pages to alert Orange County citizens to their county's fraud. In addition, he generated all his near-magical investigative accomplishments from his desk using personal discretion so dense and insulating that no one will misunderstand the meaning of his efforts.

This is not much of an argument, but more of a personal biography. Its facts remain for readers to prove or disprove by their own investigations. Here we need a cluster of proposition to constitute an argument like that which follows:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The Constitution of the United States, Amendment 2

Solution:

Premise: A well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state.

Conclusion: The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.